the data diary
  • 2025 March Madness
    • Men’s Bracket
    • Women’s Bracket
  • About
  • Projects
  • Consulting

The final pre-election forecast gives Kamala Harris a 93% chance of beating Donald Trump in Virginia.


Presidential probabilities

Each day, the model simulates thousands of plausible election results, from landslide victories to tightly contested races. Each candidate’s probability of winning is the proportion of simulations that they’ve won.

August September October November 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Election Day November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Trump 7% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93% Harris 93%

Forecasted election-day voteshare

The model first constructs a polling average, pooling data across similar states when polls are sparse. It then projects forward to election day, initially relying on non-polling indicators like economic growth and partisanship, but aligning more closely with the polling average as election day approaches.

August September October November 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% Election Day November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th November 5th Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Trump 46.7% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3% Harris 53.3%
pollster
date
population
mode
sample size
harris
trump
margin
AtlasIntel
4 November
Likely voters
Online Ad
2,141
52.8%
47.2%
D +5.6%
Research Co.
3 November
Likely voters
Online Panel
432
53.2%
46.8%
D +6.5%
Blueprint Polling
30 October
Likely voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
466
50.4%
49.6%
D +0.9%
Roanoke College Institute for Policy and Opinion Research
29 October
Likely voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
783
55.4%
44.6%
D +10.9%
Cygnal
29 October
Likely voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
558
54.1%
45.9%
D +8.2%
YouGov
25 October
Likely voters
Online Panel
1,935
54.2%
45.8%
D +8.3%
Quantus Insights
24 October
Likely voters
Online Panel
702
50.6%
49.4%
D +1.1%
The Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School of Policy and Government
23 October
Likely voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
924
53.2%
46.8%
D +6.5%
Christopher Newport University Wason Center for Civic Leadership
4 October
Likely voters
Live Phone
744
55.9%
44.1%
D +11.8%
Virginia Commonwealth University L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs
25 September
Registered voters
Live Phone/Text-to-Web
640
56.4%
43.6%
D +12.8%
1–10 of 23 rows

State similarities

The model uses state characteristics, like demographic composition, population density, and education, to estimate how similar states are to one another. Similar states are more likely to share polling biases and see similar shifts in polling trendlines.


Sources: Ballotpedia; Cook Political Report; The Economist; Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; FiveThirtyEight; Urban Stats; 270towin.com

View the source code
Explore the output


National Forecast
How this works


Competitive states
Nevada
Pennsylvania
Wisconsin
Michigan
North Carolina
Georgia
Arizona


All states
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine CD-1
Maine CD-2
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska CD-1
Nebraska CD-2
Nebraska CD-3
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Mark Rieke, 2025
All content licensed under MIT License
Made with and Quarto

 
  • View source
  • Report an issue